From owner-freebsd-isdn Wed Nov 25 12:06:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA05142 for freebsd-isdn-outgoing; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:06:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA05132 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 12:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.9.1/8.6.9) with ESMTP id VAA06782 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:05:02 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <199811252005.VAA06782@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: isppp + dynamic IP Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Nov 1998 10:02:06 +0100." <199811240902.KAA04341@neuron.webmore.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 21:05:01 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Malte Lance writes: [snip] >Some months ago i've written the changes to the sppp-code to enable >dynamic-IP-adr-assignment by just giving spppcontrol a command-line- >flag, instead of setting the local address to 0.0.0.0. So you got >the freedom to set it to any local IP-address without disabling the >dynamic-IP-address-assignment. Since nobody on this list was really >interested in the changes, i did not bother Hellmuth with the patches. > really ?!? I don't remember that (but I lost a whole slew of mail for a while). Just because noone jumped up screaming "gimme patches!" does not mean that there's no interest. Send me patches and I'll look at them for you. If we can avoid problems due to a 0.0.0.0 address then it seems like it would be worthwhile. --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message