From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 3 13:00:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9148C1065672 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF428FC15 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o73D0Ktc090227 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o73D0KwY090226; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:00:20 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:00:20 GMT Message-Id: <201008031300.o73D0KwY090226@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Simun Mikecin Cc: Subject: Re: ports/149233: Update port: net/p5-Net-SFTP-Foreign X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simun Mikecin List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:00:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/149233; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Simun Mikecin To: Edwin Groothuis Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/149233: Update port: net/p5-Net-SFTP-Foreign Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 05:25:19 -0700 (PDT) ----- Original Message ---- > From: Edwin Groothuis > To: numisemis@yahoo.com > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Sent: Tue, August 3, 2010 1:50:15 PM > Subject: Re: ports/149233: Update port: net/p5-Net-SFTP-Foreign > > Maintainer of net/p5-Net-SFTP-Foreign, > > Please note that PR ports/149233 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. Patch looks fine by me (maintainer).