From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 09:14:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F74014E78BF for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A256754F0 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 33FC014E78BE; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1012814E78BD for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C84F754EE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9EAC1E6FE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1J9ER6R093044 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1J9ERuC093040 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224895] New port: devel/ros-rosdep Multi-package manager system dependency tool for ROS Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: trueos@norwegianrockcat.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:14:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224895 --- Comment #10 from Trenton Schulz --- (In reply to Steve Wills from comment #9) Thank you for adding the dependencies in the correct field. I'm still new to these things. rosdep is a cross platform tool for handling packages and I've updated it to use pkg on FreeBSD[1]. So, no, you don't *need* rosdep per se assuming you know how to navigate dependencies or build things yourself. But, say, you are someone who only k= nows ROS and not necessarily the operating system below. Then you can use rosdep= to ensure that a package is installed. And having rosdep in the ports tree at least would make the "how do I install rosdep on FreeBSD?" part easy. Also, if you want to build ROS from source (e.g., http://wiki.ros.org/kinetic/Installation/Source), then you need a working rosdep because several scripts depend on rosdep to see if you have all the dependencies met. You can hack around the scripts, but if you are building = from source, you have other issues to work with.=20 At the beginning of 2018 (i.e., when I submitted these ports initially). I = had managed to build the minimal part of ROS Kinetic Kame. So, at least getting= the basic node up is possible. But spending a day on rosdep was part of it, and= I would be glad if others could at least skip that part, which is the reason = of ports. I'm glad there are others interested in ROS on FreeBSD. It makes it worthwh= ile to get this and other ports finished even if I can't make direct use of the= m at this exact moment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=