Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:55:06 +0200
From:      Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        autotools@FreeBSD.org, glarkin@FreeBSD.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, demon@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADS UP] charset.alias
Message-ID:  <50750DBA.5050208@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <506F01C4.6040704@FreeBSD.org> <5072E1E3.7000307@FreeBSD.org> <5074D4CD.8000208@FreeBSD.org> <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett ha scritto:
> Given that you're going to be bumping PORTREVISION on devel/gettext and
> converters/libiconv, both of which are extensively used by the rest of
> the tree, this is at the very minimum going to require an exp-run for
> verification.

I completely agree. I did a preliminary test on my tinderbox, but a full 
exp-run is needed.

> Long story short:  get explicit portmgr@ approval.  Specifically, with
> autotools@ hat on, I do NOT give approval to touch devel/gettext at all
> without the necessary nod from portmgr@

Ok, but modulo implementation errors, do you approve the idea of the 
proposed patch? In other words, do you agree that the current 
charset.alias is wrong? If so, I formally request an exp-run for the 
previously attached patch, to verify that nothing will break.

-- 
Alex Dupre



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50750DBA.5050208>