Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:55:06 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: autotools@FreeBSD.org, glarkin@FreeBSD.org, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org>, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, demon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] charset.alias Message-ID: <50750DBA.5050208@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org> References: <506F01C4.6040704@FreeBSD.org> <5072E1E3.7000307@FreeBSD.org> <5074D4CD.8000208@FreeBSD.org> <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ade Lovett ha scritto: > Given that you're going to be bumping PORTREVISION on devel/gettext and > converters/libiconv, both of which are extensively used by the rest of > the tree, this is at the very minimum going to require an exp-run for > verification. I completely agree. I did a preliminary test on my tinderbox, but a full exp-run is needed. > Long story short: get explicit portmgr@ approval. Specifically, with > autotools@ hat on, I do NOT give approval to touch devel/gettext at all > without the necessary nod from portmgr@ Ok, but modulo implementation errors, do you approve the idea of the proposed patch? In other words, do you agree that the current charset.alias is wrong? If so, I formally request an exp-run for the previously attached patch, to verify that nothing will break. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50750DBA.5050208>