From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 10 05:55:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC435E3 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (alexdupre-1-pt.tunnel.tserv23.zrh1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:25:450::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D598FC0C for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95551 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2012 05:55:07 -0000 Received: from atom.alexdupre.com (HELO ?192.168.178.12?) (sysadmin@alexdupre.com@192.168.178.12) by lab.alexdupre.com with ESMTPSA; 10 Oct 2012 05:55:07 -0000 Message-ID: <50750DBA.5050208@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:55:06 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120909 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ade Lovett Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] charset.alias References: <506F01C4.6040704@FreeBSD.org> <5072E1E3.7000307@FreeBSD.org> <5074D4CD.8000208@FreeBSD.org> <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <507507AC.8090209@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: autotools@FreeBSD.org, glarkin@FreeBSD.org, Joe Marcus Clarke , portmgr@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org, demon@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:55:12 -0000 Ade Lovett ha scritto: > Given that you're going to be bumping PORTREVISION on devel/gettext and > converters/libiconv, both of which are extensively used by the rest of > the tree, this is at the very minimum going to require an exp-run for > verification. I completely agree. I did a preliminary test on my tinderbox, but a full exp-run is needed. > Long story short: get explicit portmgr@ approval. Specifically, with > autotools@ hat on, I do NOT give approval to touch devel/gettext at all > without the necessary nod from portmgr@ Ok, but modulo implementation errors, do you approve the idea of the proposed patch? In other words, do you agree that the current charset.alias is wrong? If so, I formally request an exp-run for the previously attached patch, to verify that nothing will break. -- Alex Dupre