From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 16 02:40:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5121916A402 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 02:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED6113C44B for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 02:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so32069wra for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 19:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=lwZq0ye8O+ej9AFRjH4KcHFT/jlPyFFGPDCJxGOBi9A9GogKY1fwhSyRHkMGDc8UdPfhSs+Yq1GA252ZXXQSPXSkLB9Reafr2PDhwrqjXniaWzePjtFmFB13JDtuJPMjK0iuv2pOlThDlyjE0SZy63oIWGvRmGntMhR+FNr3F9U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=r/D0Rht9XsA4eW3eSin5yI4UpE7XeDgm7iMRqYZvPFo0AIkFUKbLCpZJG6p5ssKkRZr2hyPpCe3eQ836g7i/MKssVNnwK1XggXZM0HI9HQad5ZQ/TWLaRUWZF4vdwCoUz3kBvh1EurL0Sl/h+GIMG8daE67W5/cCB9nFIz9fhwk= Received: by 10.90.71.3 with SMTP id t3mr7292852aga.1179283237194; Tue, 15 May 2007 19:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net ( [24.34.98.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c53sm2187424wrc.2007.05.15.19.40.35; Tue, 15 May 2007 19:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:40:31 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Mark Peek Message-ID: <20070515224031.78dd92aa@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <464A008E.5040508@FreeBSD.org> References: <4649A81A.60609@bulinfo.net> <4649B5FB.2060808@bulinfo.net> <20070515105611.00747584.rnsanchez@wait4.org> <464A008E.5040508@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_o+TXFVX8ouM+hM5+3lax982; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: csh on arm failure? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 02:40:38 -0000 --Sig_o+TXFVX8ouM+hM5+3lax982 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 15 May 2007 11:48:46 -0700 Mark Peek wrote: > No, this is different. The tcsh malloc is showing it is out of memory > and aborting. The thing I don't understand is the malloc is coming > from tcsh instead of using the system malloc. Looking at this file: >=20 > src/bin/csh/config_p.h: >=20 > ... > #if defined(__FreeBSD__) > #define NLS_BUGS > #define BSD_STYLE_COLORLS > /* we want to use the system malloc when we install as /bin/csh */ > #define SYSMALLOC > /* Use LC_MESSAGES locale category to open the message catalog */ > #define MCLoadBySet NL_CAT_LOCALE > #define BUFSIZE 8192 > #endif >=20 > The SYSMALLOC define should cause it to use the system malloc and not > the tcsh malloc. Could __FreeBSD__ not be defined? >=20 > Also, it is odd that it is out of memory in the first place. Has it > worked before? Is there something that changed in the arm memory > allocation schemes? >=20 Just out of curiosity, could you try again with new libc/arm/Symbol.map in place? --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_o+TXFVX8ouM+hM5+3lax982 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGSm8fQ6z1jMm+XZYRArthAJ9zUtrBMxz13OYIKgolA6EmM605rACfRiAj l3yc0ImLyvYMmBjCWJihRZE= =8WlU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_o+TXFVX8ouM+hM5+3lax982--