From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 24 3: 0: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mailhub.fokus.gmd.de (mailhub.fokus.gmd.de [193.174.154.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABC537B401 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:59:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.gmd.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100]) by mailhub.fokus.gmd.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13993; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:59:41 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:59:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: "Eugene L. Vorokov" Cc: Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... In-Reply-To: <200108240945.f7O9jmH01400@bugz.infotecs.ru> Message-ID: <20010824115804.B43940-100000@beagle.fokus.gmd.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote: ELV>> > It's kinda late in the process to be complaining about this, but I just noticed this myself... ELV> ELV>Why not just symlink csh to tcsh then ? ELV> ELV>vel@bugz:/sys/modules/paudit # ls -l /bin/*csh ELV>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/csh ELV>-r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740996 Aug 23 23:19 /bin/tcsh ^ ELV> ELV>Is this really reasonable ? What's wrong with hard links? # ls -l /bin/csh /bin/tcsh 16112 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740880 Aug 10 14:35 csh 16112 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 740880 Aug 10 14:35 tcsh harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fhg.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message