Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Nov 1998 08:35:33 -0200 
From:      Rogerio Gatto <gatto@widesoft.com.br>
To:        freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Hideki Kobayashi <hidekoba@alles.or.jp>, "'Nate Williams'" <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Viren R. Shah" <viren@rstcorp.com>
Subject:   RES: JIT on FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <BBE7F889EE27D211BB1A00A0C9AC2B830A6528@calcio.widesoft.com.br>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I´ve got some prety good improvements with the JIT, at least
CaffeineMark 3.0 says so.  You guys can get it at
http://www.pendragon-software.com/pendragon/cm3/index.html

> ----- Mensagem original -----
> De:		Nate Williams [SMTP:nate@mt.sri.com]
> Enviada em:		Quarta-feira, 4 de Novembro de 1998 22:03
> Para:		Viren R. Shah
> Cc:		Hideki Kobayashi; Rogerio Gatto;
> freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
> Assunto:		Re: JIT on FreeBSD
> 
> > I ran my application on it:
> > without a JIT: 
> >       17.69 real        16.11 user         0.28 sys
> > with a JIT:
> >       18.16 real        16.26 user         0.34 sys
> > 
> > It actually took more time. Is this possibly due to me running a
> > 2.2.7/AOUT library on a -current/ELF system? or due to the nature of
> > the application?
> 
> Probably the nature of the appliation.  Since it's effectively
> 'compiling' the program into native code everytime you run it, if the
> program doesn't have much CPU intensive code (as it appears above)
> *OR*
> doesn't run a long time to amortize out the pre-compile, then it won't
> help you out much due to the startup overhead.
> 
> This is where Sun's much talked about 'Hot-Spot' JIT (sort of) will
> help
> out, since it only JIT's 'bottlenecks' it finds in your code, thus
> making the startup and JIT cost alot less.
> 
> 
> 
> Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BBE7F889EE27D211BB1A00A0C9AC2B830A6528>