From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 22:19:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF66A16A4CE; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:19:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA4743D2F; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:19:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars.tunkrans@bredband.net) Received: from [192.168.245.231] ([213.112.167.165] [213.112.167.165]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP <20041018221933.GOHJ18265.mxfep01.bredband.com@[192.168.245.231]>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: <417440EC.60707@bredband.net> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:17:16 +0200 From: Lars Tunkrans Organization: None User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040618 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francois Tigeot References: <000501c4b547$6a577b00$0300000a@transcon> <20041018220121.GA15058@aoi.wolfpond.org> In-Reply-To: <20041018220121.GA15058@aoi.wolfpond.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Communications Machine cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: Upgrade feasibility, to AMD64/5.x.x or to stay i386/4.9 on AMD64 hardware? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:19:36 -0000 Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 03:19:40PM -0400, Communications Machine wrote: > >>Here's what we're proposing for the new hardware: >> >>AMD Athlon64 - 3200+ (Socket 754 - I know, but it's cheap) >>MSI K8T-FSR (VIA Chipset) >>2048MB DDR400 Non-ECC RAM > > > In my experience trying to put more than 1GB RAM in a socket-754 mainboard > is asking for trouble. This type of board is incredibly picky about its > memory, especially when using more than two DIMMs. > > An Opteron platform may be a better choice here. > Yes Toms hardware has an article on this: http://www6.tomshardware.com/motherboard/20040112/index.html They say that only 3 out of 10 of the socket 754 mainboards worked with more than one DIMM.