From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 11 14:55:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C83F37B503; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13jTqj-000E5R-00; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:55:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 16:55:45 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: Jeremy Lea Cc: Jim Mock , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New GNOME hacks, etc. Message-ID: <20001011165545.K48659@FreeBSD.org> References: <20001011134155.A1323@envy.geekhouse.net> <20001011161408.J48659@FreeBSD.org> <20001011145228.U30468@shale.csir.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001011145228.U30468@shale.csir.co.za>; from reg@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:52:28PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:52:28PM -0700, Jeremy Lea wrote: > Actually, 'make -DWITHOUT_ESOUND -DWITHOUT_GNOME'. Satoshi specifically > requested that all varaibles one be tested for defined/!defined. Gah, I knew I missed something. Anyway, I think the key point here is that (a) the "extra" package building errors and (b) the migration to bsd.gnome.mk have shown to a wider audience that x11/gnomelibs is now generally not enough for a GNOME application. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message