From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 18 04:46:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A853854C for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomdean@speakeasy.org) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net [207.145.128.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E39C02 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B0BA72DD7 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:46:16 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 24188 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2013 04:46:16 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 23020, pid: 10723, t: 0.4534s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.7]) (tomdean@[24.113.104.91]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Jan 2013 04:46:16 -0000 Message-ID: <50F8D3A1.6090104@speakeasy.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:46:25 -0800 From: "Thomas D. Dean" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: time_t definition References: <50F5A189.7000701@speakeasy.org> <20130116120015.3b8d0db4@mr129166> <50F6EDFB.70501@speakeasy.org> <20130117011721.69799ef6.freebsd@edvax.de> <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44622vx4ys.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail8.sea5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=8.0 tests=RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 Cc: "questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:46:24 -0000 On 01/17/13 06:24, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > A lot of discussion about what I can do other than understand why gcc does not keep track of the basic typedef. Mayhe the question is beyond this list. Thanks for the replies. Tom Dean