From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 9 23:57:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA28865 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 23:57:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from ns2.harborcom.net (root@ns2.harborcom.net [206.158.4.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA28859 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 23:57:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bradley@dunn.org) Received: from localhost (bradley@localhost) by ns2.harborcom.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA27004 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 02:57:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 02:57:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Bradley Dunn X-Sender: bradley@ns2.harborcom.net To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) In-Reply-To: <19971007144257.56917@lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 7 Oct 1997, Greg Lehey wrote: > Interesting discussion. I didn't realize how many UUCP users there > are still out there, and how protective they are :-) I work for an ISP and we make a decent amount of money selling UUCP to small businesses. It works a whole lot better than the 'ETRN' SMTP hackery. pbd -- "Seems she thought of me as some mystic, fatalistic, mystical guru Me, I haven't got a clue." -- Tears for Fears, "Cold"