From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct  1 12:35:21 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47C616A418
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 12:35:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from db@nipsi.de)
Received: from fop.bsdsystems.de (mx.bsdsystems.de [88.198.57.43])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE2A13C469
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon,  1 Oct 2007 12:35:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from db@nipsi.de)
Received: from [172.16.1.13] (e176099039.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.176.99.39])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by fop.bsdsystems.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC85259C8;
	Mon,  1 Oct 2007 14:35:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4700E97A.1040704@nipsi.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:35:06 +0200
From: db <db@nipsi.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
References: <4700A791.6020606@encephalon.de>	<20071001091106.GB35764@garage.freebsd.pl>	<4700BC65.1000303@encephalon.de>
	<4700BE80.5080109@encephalon.de>	<4700C441.30100@nipsi.de>
	<861wcf82p3.fsf@ds4.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <861wcf82p3.fsf@ds4.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: zpool does not work
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:35:21 -0000

Dag-Erling Smørgrav schrieb:
> db <db@nipsi.de> writes:
>   
>> We reported this months ago... :-(
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=104389&cat=
>>
>> could someone please verify and commit this fix?
>>     
>
> Both patches in the PR are incorrect.  The second patch is better than
> the first, but still gets the logic wrong and completely misses the
> point of using an sbuf in the first place.
>
> DES
>   
I meant this one
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?prp=104389-3-diff
regards,
Dennis