Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 15:49:48 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Chris H <chris#@1command.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmFU-gnNqzbfpzBrAkKSrizigtsZ_3Q5KORZfL8=pv3PA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <f7a783bba9425aeaf67d94056b49f272.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> References: <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> <CADLo83-RtuRE58HORn8ocqRVtcF3ZANJoHh1D8TO=aucwywbQw@mail.gmail.com> <f7a783bba9425aeaf67d94056b49f272.authenticated@ultimatedns.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31 December 2012 15:40, Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote: > Sigh... > IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel > left out. SVN has a number of features which makes development much easier. What did you find easier to accomplish with CVS than with SVN? > Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are > they? Ports and Source currently have CVS trees. Ports has an explicit EoL on February 28th (2 months from today) Source does not have an explicit EoL though it *is* considered deprecated. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmFU-gnNqzbfpzBrAkKSrizigtsZ_3Q5KORZfL8=pv3PA>