From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Sep 8 6:43: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from liam.london.sparza.com (liam.london.sparza.com [212.135.72.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B45F37B505 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 06:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hagop.london.sparza.com ([212.135.72.28]) by liam.london.sparza.com with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #3) id 13XOR8-0007V5-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2000 14:43:22 +0100 Received: from localhost (scot@localhost) by hagop.london.sparza.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA19038 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:42:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scot@london.sparza.com) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:42:53 +0100 (BST) From: Scot Elliott To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: NetGraph and transparent proxying Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi. I wasnt to implement a transparent proxy using Cisco's WWCP and Squid. The only docs I can find reckon I should patch the 4.x kernel - but a) this stopy my kernel compiling now and b) there seems to be some GRE capability in the Netgraph stuff. Does anyone know if I can get away with not using the patch and doing the same thing with the Netgraph system?.. Thanks Scot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message