Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 23:06:46 +0000
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 202701] bsd.options.mk: OPTIONS_(SLAVE|EXCLUDE) fail to honor ${opt}_IMPLIES
Message-ID: <bug-202701-13-H2SMXwCybK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-202701-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-202701-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D202701 --- Comment #9 from Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Bryan Drewery from comment #7) > Why do we need 2 bugs? Also, I'd prefer if portmgr peers don't hijack issues for drive-by fixes but look at the bigger picture as well. Bugzilla is a tool for collaboration, n= ot an indicator how bad your software is that needs every bug squashed ASAP. B= ugs without patches often don't attract attention until at least more than 1 pe= rson is affected. And no one (or very few) would be motivated to submit a fix if such bugs are closed shortly after being opened. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-202701-13-H2SMXwCybK>