From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 24 16:43:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFF516A41F for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outR.internet-mail-service.net (outR.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F2513C4A6 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160) by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:43:32 -0700 Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35348125ADA; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <46A62C57.5010802@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:44:07 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Macintosh/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremie Le Hen References: <200707032126.l63LQ7ea027929@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070703142714.F552@10.0.0.1> <20070723201642.GC96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <46A54A0B.4000109@elischer.org> <20070724153608.GH96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20070724153608.GH96643@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_descrip.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:43:33 -0000 Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 05:38:35PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> I think that is the wrong question.. >> the question is "why do we drop off after 8?" >> which I'm sure Jeff is already working on. > > Actually since the workbench has been run on an 8-core amd64 and that > both Linux and FreeBSD drop here, I thought it was natural to get the > best performance with 8 threads... Am I wrong? The ideal situation would be to reach a peak at 8 and stay there. > Regards,