Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:27:24 -0700 (PDT) From: exorcistkiller <exorcistkiller@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Add setacl system call? Message-ID: <1311658044945-4633662.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107250753370.51541@fledge.watson.org> References: <1311496832217-4627557.post@n5.nabble.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107250753370.51541@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you Robert! Another question while I'm reading the code. In ufs_acl.c, in static int ufs_getacl_posix1e(struct vop_getacl_args *ap), you commented: As part of the ACL is stored in the inode, and the rest in an EA, assemble both into a final ACL product. From what I learned from Kirk's book, ACLs are supposed be stored in extended attributes blocks. So what do you mean by "part of the ACL is stores in the inode"? I know extended attributes blocks data can be addressed by inode, but how to get ACL directly from the inode? -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Add-setacl-system-call-tp4627557p4633662.html Sent from the freebsd-hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1311658044945-4633662.post>