Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 11:47:27 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net>, Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@mail.theinternet.com.au>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My views on Eclipse/BSD Message-ID: <20000213034727.EA6E81CD9@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> of "Sun, 13 Feb 2000 03:15:49 %2B0900." <38A5A355.92BE74B5@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: > Peter Wemm wrote: > > > > One key thing to keep in mind is that copyrights apply automatically > > regardless of age, contracts etc. You have no right to copy a copyrighted > > work unless the right to do so is given to you (or you have statutory > > rights such as making backups etc). In this case, you don't have the right > > to redistribute it except those granted by the license with it's > > conditions. If you don't accept the license or cannot because you're under > > the age of being able to enter into a contract or whatever, then you can't > > redistribute it *period*. You can download it (they are distributing it, > > not you), and do pretty much whatever you like with it once they've given > > it to you, but you can't give it to anyone else. This means that if you > > were under 18 etc, you probably could use it for commercial purposes if you > > believed the license didn't apply. (And Lucent/whoever *do* own the > > copyright on the additional Eclipse stuff). > > So... basically... you can't redistribute GPL code unless law permits > you to enter contracts? How funny... :-) It depends on whether you consider a redistribution license a contract or not. If it says somthing to the effect of "in order to redistribute this, these are the conditions you must follow", that's not necessarily a contract. You don't have any obligations, unless you want the right to distribute it. However, if it's a "click here to accept" in order to download something, then thats closer to a contract as it's getting you to accept obligations regardless of whether you distribute it or not. This covers things like "no commercial use" and so on. You can generally only impose restrictions on *usage* via some sort of contract. The GPL is very much the former. You can pretty much do whatever you damn well please with it and have absolutely no obligations. But to get the right to distribute the copyrighted code (or derivatives), then the license spells out the conditions under which you can distribute it. The BSD license is similar - you don't have any obligations unless you want to distribute it. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000213034727.EA6E81CD9>