Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:52:22 +0800 From: Aiza <aiza21@comclark.com> To: Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new jail utility is available. announcement. Message-ID: <4C46C356.6000101@comclark.com> In-Reply-To: <4C46BAAD.5000507@unsane.co.uk> References: <4C452644.6060508@comclark.com> <20100720134205.3168f4f1@scorpio> <4C45EA1C.6070601@comclark.com> <20100720153209.74ec26e6@scorpio> <4C45FCE1.7010006@comclark.com> <20100720163651.0daf727d@scorpio> <AANLkTine1n4rMfnWd-oiQHe1PY2mBtGDpMdGgI_W0TR4@mail.gmail.com> <4C46BAAD.5000507@unsane.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Not yet, when I have a spare box I might, although I quite like using > zfs for jails as you can limit the disk usage dynamically per zfs > filesystem and I didnt see any support there yet, even basic support > like there is with ezjail would be nice. > Zfs was left out because its over kill. Sparse image jails gives the same protection at a 10th of the overhead.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C46C356.6000101>