From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 17:27:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C262837B401; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from godel.mtl.distributel.net (nat.MTL.distributel.NET [66.38.181.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111C943FAF; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:27:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) Received: from godel.mtl.distributel.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h6TKWbaA054376; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:32:37 GMT (envelope-from bmilekic@technokratis.com) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by godel.mtl.distributel.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TKWXfo054375; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:32:33 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: godel.mtl.distributel.net: bmilekic set sender to bmilekic@technokratis.com using -f Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:32:33 +0000 From: Bosko Milekic To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20030729203233.GA54357@technokratis.com> References: <88569.1059513090@critter.freebsd.dk> <89068.1059516558@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <89068.1059516558@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: jeffr@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: UMA not reentrant / possible memory leak X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:28:00 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:09:18AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <88569.1059513090@critter.freebsd.dk>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > >[I'm CC'ing current because this seems to have a significant negative > >impact on -current kernel stability, and we can use some more data, > >in particular on non-i386 SMP machines] > > I just committed a workaround for this problem, until JeffR can > find time to hunt it down. > > People running 5.1 and possibly 5.0 on SMP kernels may want to apply > this patch: Thank you so much for doing this. I was going to do this myself but had to leave the office. Hopefully Jeff will have a chance to take a look at it otherwise I`ll be glancing at it tomorrow. Also, it would be nice if those suffering from recent problems with kmem_map exhaustion on 5.1 try this and note whether or not it gets rid of your panics. Regards, -- Bosko Milekic * bmilekic@technokratis.com * bmilekic@FreeBSD.org TECHNOkRATIS Consulting Services * http://www.technokratis.com/