From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  8 10:55:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B65F4BA7
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2014 10:55:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8342A1A51
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  8 Sep 2014 10:55:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s88AtsC0065743
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:55:54 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193459] www/mod_security dependency on db48 shared library is
 missing
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:55:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: matorola@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-193459-13-3akllYf8TF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193459-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193459-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:55:54 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193459

matorola@gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Issue Resolved              |In Discussion
         Resolution|Works As Intended           |---

--- Comment #2 from matorola@gmail.com ---
Well, probably I wasn't specific, what I meant is that, removing db48 package
via "pkg remove db48" should warn that there's packages, which are still depend
on it, for example, ap22-mod_security (which is indeed has libdb-4.8.so.0 as
required):

[root@u163 14:51:01 /]# pkg info ap22-mod_security
ap22-mod_security-2.7.7_3
Name           : ap22-mod_security
Version        : 2.7.7_3
Installed on   : Tue Jun 24 16:32:50 MSK 2014
Origin         : www/mod_security
Architecture   : freebsd:10:x86:64
Prefix         : /usr/local
Categories     : www security
Licenses       : APACHE20
Maintainer     : walter@lifeforms.nl
WWW            : http://www.modsecurity.org/
Comment        : Intrusion detection and prevention engine
Options        :
        LUA            : off
        MLOGC          : off
Shared Libs required:
        libxml2.so.2
        libpcre.so.3
        libgdbm.so.4
        libexpat.so.6
        libdb-4.8.so.0
        libaprutil-1.so.0
        libapr-1.so.0

but currently, removing db48 does not have this warning:

[root@u163 14:52:02 /]# pkg remove db48
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages
in the universe):

Installed packages to be REMOVED:
        db48-4.8.30.0_2

The operation will free 12 MB.

Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]:

PS: taking it to the apr side, apr has libdb-5.3.so.0 in the requirements,
which is provided by db5 (db5-5.3.28_1) package.

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.