From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 21 18:25:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEE11065679 for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112218FC2B for ; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 7588 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2008 18:25:27 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 21 Jun 2008 18:25:27 -0000 Message-ID: <485D4510.9070703@telenix.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:14:40 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Max Laier References: <20080611051257.GA51683@what-creek.com> <200806211900.29140.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <200806211900.29140.max@love2party.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, John Birrell Subject: Re: Getting started with DTrace in FreeBSD-current (a.k.a. 8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:25:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 11 June 2008 07:12:57 John Birrell wrote: >> It's been a few weeks now since I committed DTrace support to current. >> >> I did this without a headsup message to this list to give the early >> adopters a chance to try it before exposing it to the world at large. > ... >> 11. Go wild! > > This might be a stupid question, but it seems that timestamp (and friends) > roll-over at 32bit, not 64 as advertised in the documentation. Is this a > feature or a bug? > Interesting. Can I ask, has the problem with (in the Xorg build) the uid_t not being recognized been gotten past yet? I have a system that could be testing in only a few minutes, if you tell me it's probably fixed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIXUUQz62J6PPcoOkRAtZwAJ4ioA4Ho9nS6iAy0cDM2JmHRGAeBwCffe7Y L7ctvK9nCfvBAYgN1lTj+yw= =J1Ce -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----