From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 15 15:56:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA17604 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from argus (pm3-p5.tfs.net [206.154.183.197]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA17590 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 15:56:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jbryant@localhost) by argus (8.6.12/8.6.12) id RAA12197; Tue, 15 Apr 1997 17:56:52 -0500 From: Jim Bryant Message-Id: <199704152256.RAA12197@argus> Subject: Re: question about X.25 drivers To: dennis@etinc.com (dennis) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 1997 17:56:51 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: jbryant@tfs.net In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970415082618.006d345c@etinc.com> from "dennis" at Apr 15, 97 08:26:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply: > >> If nobody actively maintains X.25 then it dies, period. > > For anyone that cares X.25 != AX.25, so why this discussion? thank you... there are a lot of similarities though, but like i said AX.25 != X.25... I believe it is close enough that a netccitt style interface could be possible though... jim -- All opinions expressed are mine, if you | "I will not be pushed, stamped, think otherwise, then go jump into turbid | briefed, debriefed, indexed, or radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!! | numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner" jbryant@tfs.net - KC5VDJ 2M, 70cm, KPC-3+ - kc5vdj@wv0t.#neks.ks.usa.noam