From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 28 00:21:55 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA09046 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 00:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sendero-ppp.i-connect.net (sendero-ppp.i-Connect.Net [206.190.143.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA09036 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 1997 00:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28514 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Jun 1997 07:14:56 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2-alpha [p0] on FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199706270741.RAA17175@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 00:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Organization: Atlas Telecom From: Simon Shapiro To: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: Clists limited to 1024 bytes? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, bmcgover@cisco.com Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi Bruce Evans; On 27-Jun-97 you wrote: ... > You don't want to do this. At 19200 bps, an 8K buffer takes more than > 4 seconds to fill. A latency of 4 seconds is normally about 400 times > too large. At such a low speed, there is normally nothing better than > delivering input in tiny bursts of 19-20 characters every 10 msec. Except with heavy PPP loads. Right? Simon