From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 13:21:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98A137B401 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.x123.info (165.Red-80-37-224.pooles.rima-tde.net [80.37.224.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 907F243F85 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:21:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from esn@x123.info) Received: (qmail 8187 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 20:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wire.x123.info) (esn@192.168.1.2) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Jun 2003 20:20:49 -0000 From: "Sebastian Yepes [ESN]" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 22:20:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200306032220.57143.esn@x123.info> Subject: HD Speed Benchmark X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 20:21:07 -0000 I have made some Benchmark on my inspiron 8500 (Intel 82801DB (ICH4) - UDMA100) and i am geting very Bad results on the 5.1, i have got beter results on 5.0 dmesg -- 5.0R --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.0R 5.1B2 --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/dmesg.5.1B2 Check out the output of bonnie++: 5.0R --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/bonnie.5.0R 5.1B2 --> http://www.x123.info/src/i8500/bonnie.5.1B2 -- /* FingerPrint: 5BF1 58B1 DE75 CBE3 6044 7098 1246 1EF6 9E78 041C @@@@@@@ @@@@@@ @@@@@@@ @@! @@@ !@@ @@! @@@ @!@!@!@ !@@!! @!@ !@! !!: !!! !:! !!: !!! :: : :: ::.: : :: : : The Power To Kill LinuX */