Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:05:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: "hackmiester (Hunter Fuller)" <hackmiester@hackmiester.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! Message-ID: <4509A7ED.4090701@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <C9F971C5-50FE-4BF0-9975-83E8072E6C3F@hackmiester.com> References: <20060909173813.GA1388@FS.denninger.net> <45065C67.6040503@cs.tu-berlin.de> <C9F971C5-50FE-4BF0-9975-83E8072E6C3F@hackmiester.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) schrieb: > > On 12 September 2006, at 02:06, Björn König wrote: > >> Karl Denninger schrieb: >> >>> This is not cool folks. >> >> >> I think you misunderstood what -STABLE means. (Or maybe I do?) >> >> -STABLE is still a development branch without guarantee of a stable >> and working operating system. > > > Hahahahaha... That's ironic... That wasn't meant to be ironic. Years of experience and observations of development lead to this conclusion. Regards Björn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4509A7ED.4090701>