From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 23 22:20:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16880106564A; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72088FC0A; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.mouf.net (bender.mouf.net [IPv6:2001:470:8:58f:21c:b3ff:feb5:bf32] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7NMJMuK052114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:19:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) From: Steve Wills Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:19:57 -0400 Message-Id: <97612B57-1255-4BB3-A6D3-FC74324C6D67@FreeBSD.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:19:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=4.5 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:20:07 -0000 Hi, It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to = /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. =46rom a user standpoint, it = is confusing that running the command gets different results the second = time it is run vs. the first time. I can imagine a user saying "I ran = pkg, but it didn't do what they said it would. Now I run it again, and = it does do what it is supposed to." Also, it would enable setting up a = pkg-bootstrap man page separate from the pkg man page, without confusion = about which one you're looking at. So, opinions? There may still be time to fix it for 9.1 if we can decide = quickly. Thanks, Steve