From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 23 14:34:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA29643 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:34:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA29636 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 14:34:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA27892; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:32:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA11426; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:30:15 -0600 Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:30:15 -0600 Message-Id: <199804232130.PAA11426@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: Nate Williams , shimon@simon-shapiro.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A CAM of worms In-Reply-To: <199804232045.OAA11155@pluto.plutotech.com> References: <199804232018.OAA11026@mt.sri.com> <199804232045.OAA11155@pluto.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > If CAM offers the same support (plus more) as the current SCSI code when it > is integrated, then most users won't even notice a difference. Those that > do will see increased performance and/or reliability. That's all I am asking, and I think you and I are in violent agreement. We now return to your regulary scheduled 'Why is X-10 in the tree' flamefest, and sorry for the minor flameout. ;) Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message