From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:05:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF9D16A4CE; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:05:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gnah.bolet.org (gnah.bolet.org [80.65.226.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC44543D2F; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pornin@bolet.org) Received: from gnah.bolet.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gnah.bolet.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8RE5DO4021465; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:05:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pornin@bolet.org) Received: (from pornin@localhost) by gnah.bolet.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8RE5CXG021464; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:05:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pornin) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:05:11 +0200 From: Thomas Pornin To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20040927140511.GA21303@gnah.bolet.org> References: <20040927094602.GA17898@gnah.bolet.org> <20040927111734.GS9550@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040927111734.GS9550@darkness.comp.waw.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Software RAID1 with atacontrol X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:05:25 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:17:34PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I can only suggest gmirror(8):) That's my next step, but I confess that I find this message a bit scary: http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=1095762299.00135859.1095751801%4010.7.7.3 I want RAID1 so that downtime is minimized in case of disk crash. If the machine cannot boot with one disk, this goal is not fulfilled. And having the root filesystem unmirrored (and just manually duplicated) is a bit cumbersome and raises some issues (e.g., the root filesystem reference in /etc/fstab). Is there any clue about when this will be fixed ? (Maybe it is done already...) --Thomas Pornin