From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Jul 1 08:55:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA05525 for chat-outgoing; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:55:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA05517 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 08:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA21768; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 09:55:28 -0600 (MDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 09:55:28 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199707011555.JAA21768@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Annelise Anderson Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Why does FreeBSD install csh as the default shell instead of tcsh? Because tcsh isn't part of the base system, and IMHO it should not be since it's 3rd party developed software, it's bigger/badder/un-necessary for most people, and tcsh is easy to install. I'm an anti-bloatist by nature. :) Nate ps. I use tcsh as my personal shell, so don't be thinking I don't like tcsh. :)