From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 21:03:16 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A136F47 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5207F2588 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6TL3GL3094029 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:03:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 189646] [PATCH] lang/ruby19, lang/ruby20, lang/ruby21: fix RDOC options handling and etc. Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:03:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: swills@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ruby@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:03:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189646 --- Comment #6 from Steve Wills --- (In reply to Yasuhiro KIMURA from comment #5) > Created attachment 143828 [details] > Updated patch to use dynamic plist for C API documents. > > After doxygen port is updated files/directories tree of C API document > changed. So I conclude static plist is not suitable for C API document and > switch back to dynamic plist about it. I wasn't able to reproduce that issue with the static plist. I think it will be OK with the static plist. I'll add an attachment with my updated patch that I think will work for this. Let me know your thoughts. (Note my patch is only for 1.9 right now, but I'll update for 2.0 and 2.1 soon.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.