Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 11:07:34 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about the scsi sub system. Message-ID: <E0voCVq-00031I-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 25 Jan 1997 18:34:05 %2B0100." <Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <E0vo1Ma-00025B-00@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Mutt.19970125183405.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes: : Move the START UNIT command earlier in the sdopen() function. I've : already did this for the `cd' and `od' driver, and at least in the : latter case, it works fine. (I'm running the `od' driver with an : automatic spindown at odclose().) I noticed that in the sd and cd drivers, the start unit command are placed in the same location, relative to eachother. Is this in your private copy? In a branch that I'm missing? Anyway, I'm going to try moving scsi_start_unit() to before the scsi_test_unit_ready() call and see if that helps or not. Thanks for the suggestion! Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0voCVq-00031I-00>