From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 03:12:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D862A106566C; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32238FC0C; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3S3CDeu055110; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:12:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3S3CCkC055109; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:12:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:12:12 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Bob Bishop Message-ID: <20120428031212.GE80419@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Bob Bishop , Konstantin Belousov , toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20120426093548.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? Precedence: bulk User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 03:12:13 -0000 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:38:03PM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: > > Apparently, current dependencies are much more spread, e.g. /bin/sh > > is dynamically linked [etc] > > That seems like a bad mistake, because it would prevent even booting > single-user if rtld/libraries are broken. When one enters single user they are prompted for which shell to use. If /bin/sh is broken due to being dynamic, '/rescue/sh' will likely still work. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)