From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Fri Feb 17 08:05:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BD6CE29DA for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE78311B7 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v1H85P5J058949 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:05:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195934] clang350-import branch not working on sparc64 Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:05:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: edinaclark11@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dim@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 08:05:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D195934 Edina Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |edinaclark11@gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Edina Clark --- it isn't a processor you can drop into a PC motherboard and have work. You would require whatever remains of the supercomputer to really make utilizat= ion of the processors - it will have huge numbers of them. I am hardware engine= er and writer at http://www.essaycampus.co.uk. These machines commonly require some fairly radical cooling and it isn't remarkable for fluid nitrogen to be utilized to this end. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=