From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr  2 01:04:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629DD37B401
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 01:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za
	[196.31.7.201])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF30B43FB1
	for <java@freebsd.org>; Wed,  2 Apr 2003 01:04:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net)
Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 190eAD-0000FT-00; Wed, 02 Apr 2003 11:04:09 +0200
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:04:09 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
Message-ID: <20030402090409.GF725@starjuice.net>
References: <3E898C29.3080501@bowtie.nl>
	<20030402014321.A70241@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030402014321.A70241@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
cc: java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: jni.h and jni_md.h in jdk 1.4.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:04:28 -0000

On (2003/04/02 01:43), Greg Lewis wrote:

> > So shouldn't that line read:
> > 
> > #include "bsd/jni_md.h"
> 
> No.  No other JDK 1.4.1 does this, neither do 1.3.1, 1.2.2, etc.  What
> should probably be the case is that the file should be in a subdirectory
> named freebsd rather than bsd, since I've commonly seen this detected
> with the lowercase of `uname -s`.  This would be in line with 1.3.1.

Would we be shot for a symlink?

Ciao,
Sheldon.