From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 16:40:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7EB106567D for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@quuxo.com) Received: from hudson.quuxo.net (hudson.quuxo.net [203.18.245.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F268FC31 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 16:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael@quuxo.com) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (ppp121-44-14-240.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net [121.44.14.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by hudson.quuxo.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m56GFl0g019543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Jun 2008 01:45:47 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from michael@quuxo.com) From: Michael Gratton To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: <702FA4B9-8CEE-4C9D-86A8-157CA1E69BD7@khera.org> References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <4846D849.2090005@FreeBSD.org> <20080604204325.GD4701@lava.net> <702FA4B9-8CEE-4C9D-86A8-157CA1E69BD7@khera.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mTPtmXE7iOpWB5K7Twt6" Organization: Quuxo Software Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 02:15:42 +1000 Message-Id: <1212768942.6066.20.camel@tremelay> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (hudson.quuxo.net [203.18.245.242]); Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:45:48 +0930 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/7386/Fri Jun 6 22:05:23 2008 on hudson.quuxo.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:40:54 -0000 --=-mTPtmXE7iOpWB5K7Twt6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:08 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote: >=20 > > Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from > > people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average > > more stable than 6.2. I really haven't gotten any clear impression as >=20 > I'll throw in my "+1" for running 6.3. I have it on many boxes, some =20 > of which run gmirror and some of which have bge devices (some with =20 > both). Never any problems. They operate things varying from Postgres =20 > servers to DNS servers to mail servers (postfix) under pretty =20 > consistent load pushing lots and lots of data both network and to disk. AOL! 6.3 with gmirror is rock solid here for web, mail, dns and db. No bge here, but still, I haven't seen 6.3 glitch once. /Mike --=20 Michael Gratton =20 Quuxo Software --=-mTPtmXE7iOpWB5K7Twt6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBISWKun1mVFlYUR84RAqfDAKCCKf5uf1rTKk2hOxSmmZJZSyIYrwCgzcD+ hN69YZx2nku3/IXd2rvbku8= =4M/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-mTPtmXE7iOpWB5K7Twt6--