From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jun 22 10:48:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA22695
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA22690
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA10318; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Wanted: Testers for an alternate to /usr/obj (as we know it). 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Jun 1996 11:34:17 MDT."
             <199606221734.LAA16449@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:48:09 -0700
Message-ID: <10315.835465689@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Umm, why would it be any different?  The symlink would be for the user
> only.  The make system wouldn't even be aware of it's existance.  Again,
> this is for *me* to be able to see the contents of the obj directory
> easily.

Ah..  Well, we can worry about this as an optional enhancement later.
It's not hard to create the symlink from the obj rule.

					Jordan