Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:51:49 -0800
From:      "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Advanced Format Drive ?
Message-ID:  <26202.1353019909@tristatelogic.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211151456450.66706@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

In message <alpine.BSF.2.00.1211151456450.66706@wonkity.com>, 
Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote:

>> It wouldn't hurt to add the above info to your tutorial page.
>
>The problem with that sort of detail is that too much of it obscures the 
>point, which in this case is just trying to show the right way to set up 
>disks without overwhelming the reader.

<personal opinion>
Some things are inherently overwhelming, and there is no use to try to
hide the fact.  It just makes matters worse.
</personal opinion>

>> P.S.  I really do think that it is a serious omission that the gpart(8)
>> man page doesn't really say anything regarding proper or desirable use
>> of the "add -a" option.  If it were up to me, I'd put in just a couple
>> of short notes that would say at least something about 4K being Good and
>> Desirable for modern drives, and 1M being Good and Desirable for SSDs.
>>
>> But maybe that kind of info does really belong in something more like
>> an actual tutorial document... you know... something like, um, your's.
>
>I can see it both ways.  A short mention of those values in that section 
>of gpart(8) would be helpful.  The 1M value is controversial to some 
>people.

Yeabut for some people, even evolution is "controversial".

>Of course, some people think that calling bare bsdlabel disks 
>"dangerously dedicated" or using an MBR is controversial.

Actually, you can count me among the folks who think that the adjective
"dangerously" may be stretching it a bit, in this context.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?26202.1353019909>