From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 19 21: 0:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C19F37B401 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0249A43E6A for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 21:00:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g8K407h4002587; Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:00:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: marcus@marcuscom.com, julian@elischer.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mozilla busted? In-Reply-To: <20020919.215117.60502717.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <1032493248.346.46.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> > Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:38, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <1032492643.346.44.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> > : > Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > : > : On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : > In message: > : > : > Julian Elischer writes: > : > : > : Is it statically linked? > : > : > > : > : > Yup. > : > : > : > : You'll need to rebuild against the new libc_r, then. > : > > : > Yuck. I'd rather nail jello to a tree than try to update a port that > : > complicated. > : > : If it makes you feel better, I just ran a compile on my -CURRENT > : machine, and it went fine. Both mozilla and mozilla-devel should build > : out of the tree....with or without jello. > > Do you know if this breaks libc_r.so.4.0 too? I'm thinking of just > grabbing the build from Mozilla.org... I think it does since it's a kernel ABI breakage in ucontext_t's and sigreturn(). I think we either need to reformat the ucontext_t in some way that is compatible with the old format, or make a new sigreturn() using the current one for compatibility. It's a shame 'cause it's only broken for i386, not the other archs. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message