From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 19:05:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194C51065672 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [128.104.255.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0368FC21 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 19:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCBF582E7; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:05:17 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at icecube.wisc.edu Received: from mail.icecube.wisc.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trout.icecube.wisc.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id y5M9Av049-6R; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:05:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from wanderer.tachypleus.net (i3-dhcp-172-16-223-126.icecube.wisc.edu [172.16.223.126]) by mail.icecube.wisc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037735824F; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:05:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4E5FD76C.5080304@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:05:16 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Thyer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Warren Block , Jason Campbell , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems booting 9.0-BETA1 memstick X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:05:18 -0000 On 09/01/11 14:00, Matt Thyer wrote: > Shouldn't we use MBR partitioning instead of GPT for the memstick image ? > > We won't need larger than 2TiB installation media for many decades! It uses GPT so that the partition can be labeled, and fstab will not need e.g. da0 hard-coded into it. makefs, which builds the filesystem, does not support UFS labels. -Nathan