Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:10:46 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        Kelly Jones <kelly.terry.jones@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need a filesystem with "unlimited" inodes
Message-ID:  <4A2E1906.5090708@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20090609040443.GA56070@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <26face530906081813x5abd6d28i27137b76b0be41c@mail.gmail.com> <20090609040443.GA56070@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 08), Kelly Jones said:
>> What UFS-like filesystem has unlimited inodes, but is a drop-in
>> replacement for ext3, and is fairly easy to configure?
>>
>> Is UFS2 no longer considered the "best" general-use filesystem?
>>
>> Reason I ask: I'm going to create many small (~1K) files on a 100G
>> disk and thus need at least 100M inodes.
>>
>> "newfs -i" maxes out at ~52M inodes (862 groups * 60864 inodes =~ 52M
>> inodes):
>>
>> # newfs -N -i 1 /dev/da1;: same results as -i 2048
>>
>> /dev/da1: 102400.0MB (209715200 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size
>>         2048 using 862 cylinder groups of 118.88MB, 7608 blks, 60864
>>         inodes.
>>
>> I realize I can use "f 512 -b 4096" to get 200M+ inodes, but I'm willing
>> to experiment w/ a new filesystem, provided it behaves mostly like UFS. 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> At this point you're sort of out of the general-use category :)  You want
> ZFS.  Or rather, you don't want to try and fsck a UFS filesystem with 200M
> inodes.  The three drawbacks I can think of to ZFS are it's hard to boot
> from (although you probably aren't booting from da1), it requires more
> memory than UFS, and there is no ACL support at the moment (not that many
> people used the ACL support for UFS).  If you're already on an amd64 system
> with 4GB or more RAM you'll be fine.
> 

Or store your data in a RDBMS rather than in the filesystem.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

-- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       Flat 3
                                                      7 Priory Courtyard
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Ramsgate
                                                      Kent, CT11 9PW, UK


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkouGQYACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VZYvQCeNkiUUQ2XsFzpmNG+k0iJNqwT
xJYAn32c26mD4MLHsUFUIlsx42a5k7bp
=bynH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A2E1906.5090708>