From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 6 16:09:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F0A16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:09:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com (kirk.webonaut.com [212.41.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E35543D5A for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADCE7642C; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:09:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sv02.webonaut.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13033-04; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (sisko.webonaut.com [212.41.243.28]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8484876428; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 18:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40EACEB2.2020106@webonaut.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:09:22 +0200 From: Franz Klammer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040705) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <1089129399.877.0.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1089129399.877.0.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at webonaut.com cc: gnome-list@gnome.org cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Deficiency in nautilus or metacity X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 16:09:33 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 09:31, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > >>I've been rather bothered by what I perceive to be a deficiency in >>GNOME's handling of "launchers". Not sure if this is attributable to >>metacity or nautilus or both (I'd be interested to know which). >> >>When creating a new launcher, a rich set of options are available. But >>bringing up the properties for an existing launcher, the user is >>presented with a much more restricted functionality, preventing the >>easy modification of certain properties. >> >>I'm wondering what the rationale is for this, whether it's intentional >>or not, and whether or not we may see some enhancement of the launcher >>properties dialog in the future. > > > Specifically, what properties are missing in edit mode that are there > when creating a new launcher? Both of my screens are identical. same thing here - guessing Conrad mean the following: create a launcher on the desktop and then try to change the properties. franz. > > Joe > > >>Thanks.