From owner-freebsd-chat  Thu Aug  7 17:05:50 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA08640
          for chat-outgoing; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 17:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA08628
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 17:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66])
	by hwcn.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA11080;
	Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:06:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost)
	by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA12932;
	Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:06:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org>
X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca
Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org
To: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM>
cc: chat@freebsd.org
Subject: UUnet, spam, and the "wild west"!
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.970807200148.12315A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Congratulations!  You've made "vigilante" status in the local
paper!

While the article was probably slanted a little towards UUnet
(probably because its easier to interview UUnet spokesmen than
cyber-people), it was telling that on the opposite page was an
article explaining that the reason you got an email advertising
porn was possibly because you posted on Usenet.