From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 26 09:34:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3907116A438; Fri, 26 May 2006 09:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1F743D53; Fri, 26 May 2006 09:34:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate2.punkt.de with ESMTP id k4Q9Yl8d021305; Fri, 26 May 2006 11:34:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4Q9Yh6G096204; Fri, 26 May 2006 11:34:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k4Q9YhXh096203; Fri, 26 May 2006 11:34:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 11:34:43 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Jonathan Noack Message-ID: <20060526093443.GC94280@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <200605251845.k4PIjdx7070553@freefall.freebsd.org> <4476457A.5050800@alumni.rice.edu> <200605260837.k4Q8btpl031485@freefall.freebsd.org> <4476C99C.50200@alumni.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4476C99C.50200@alumni.rice.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Tim Kientzle , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (bsd)tar is broken on 6.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 09:34:49 -0000 Hello! > > I have narrowed the problem to a specific subdirectory and I think I > > have the explanation: > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 jmz jmz 4312 Apr 16 1947 supclkrd.prg > > > > Don't ask me why the date is wrong, this is really old stuff :-) Since there cannot be a date before January 1st 1970, 0:00 on any Unix system, i guess there's something seriously broken here. Signed/unsigned overflow for the time_t value in question? Regards, Patrick M. Hausen -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de