Date: Sat, 15 Apr 1995 14:24:25 -0400 From: "Alok K. Dhir" <adhir@iagi.net> To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: (fwd) Re: Xwindow Probs - Help - AGAIN... Message-ID: <199504151824.OAA24545@bigdipper.iagi.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Here's something from the newsgroup that sounds like a potential problem -
is this something that should be addressed?
In article <3meakh$ql4@fu-berlin.de>, Thomas Graichen <graichen@sirius.physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>but care must be taken - if the libgcc.so.* is in /usr/lib - each new binary
>will be compiled with it by default - not a good idea - it had to be kept in
>a dir whioch is searched by ld.so but not by gcc and ld - t
But whether libgcc.so.261.0 is placed in /usr/lib by the installer
or by the user makes no difference then. If gcc 2.6.3 really does try
to link with libgcc.so.261.0 instead of libgcc.a then that's a
different problem.
--
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org
--
Alok K. Dhir
Internet Access Group, Inc.
adhir@iagi.net
(301) 652-0484 Fax: (301) 652-0649
http://www.iagi.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504151824.OAA24545>