From owner-freebsd-ipfw Thu Apr 18 8:58:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from free.wgops.com (dsl092-002-178.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.2.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E75937B416; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wgops.com ([10.1.2.207]) by free.wgops.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3IFwVR65844; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:58:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mloftis@wgops.com) Message-ID: <3CBEED27.1030305@wgops.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:58:31 -0700 From: Michael Loftis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Giannis Nikopoulos , freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Load balancing with NATD References: <200204071726.UAA12257@pontus.cs.uoi.gr> <3CB9B72B.7020908@wgops.com> <20020418144250.GF70982@sunbay.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >Yes it does support this, but in a simplistic form. Search for the >"LSNAT" word in the natd(8) and libalias(3) manpages. > You missed part of his question, he has his own algorithm he's using. The question wasn't if it supported it, but if it supported whacking out the RR mechanism in favor of some other algo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message