From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 17:10:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F9F106566B for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235E18FC08 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-45-144.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.45.144]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706CE1E750; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:10:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id p2VHA1Vf001714; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:10:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:10:01 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Arthur Chance Message-Id: <20110331191001.3e0877e3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4D94ACC5.9000706@qeng-ho.org> References: <20110329144527.c009ba8b.jhsu802701@jasonhsu.com> <20110331000028.00eb96c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D94A67C.602@qeng-ho.org> <4D94ACC5.9000706@qeng-ho.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Easiest desktop BSD distro X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:10:04 -0000 On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:33:09 +0100, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 03/31/11 17:06, Arthur Chance wrote: > > On 03/30/11 23:00, Polytropon wrote: > >> There is a project called VirtualBSD that developed a > >> FreeBSD system image that can be used with VirtualBox. > > > > Nitpick: the web site says > > > > > VirtualBSD is a virtual appliance for VMware > > > > Following myself up, Polytropon was technically correct as the FAQ says > > > VirtualBSD is somewhat compatible with VirtualBox, but not right away > > and not easily. > > but I suspect the level of effort needed is going to put people off > trying it. Isn't VMware more common than VBox on most systems anyway? Thanks for stating that; in fact, I was confusing VMWare and VirtualBox while typing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...