From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Jul 24 16: 7:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peter3.wemm.org (c1315225-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.14.150.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF2F37B434 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:07:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by peter3.wemm.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6ON7IM48642 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:07:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBC9380B; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:07:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: moving struct module out of kern_module.c In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:07:18 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20010724230718.4CBC9380B@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Currently, struct module is defined in kern_module.c and opaque to the > rest of the kernel. I'd like to move the definition out into module.h > so linprocfs can access it. Any objections? It is intentionally opaque, just like the device stuff. If there is an interface deficiency then that is what needs addressing, not groping around private infrastructure internals. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message