From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat Feb 20 16:49:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5430954E194; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@freebsd.org) Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DjZCs5P78z3vpZ; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martymac@freebsd.org) X-Originating-IP: 78.248.30.101 Received: from home.martymac.org (sse35-1-78-248-30-101.fbx.proxad.net [78.248.30.101]) (Authenticated sender: ganael.laplanche@martymac.org) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6B9860008; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:49:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Ganael Laplanche To: Alexey Dokuchaev , Steve Wills Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r566074 - in head: archivers/par2cmdline-tbb biology/bowtie2 cad/opencascade devel devel/onetbb devel/onetbb/files devel/tbb graphics/blender graphics/blender/files graphics/embree grap... Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <1617147.MsCH1bHPGx@home.martymac.org> In-Reply-To: References: <202102191514.11JFEkbg088782@repo.freebsd.org> <4833515.YNO7O01DYZ@home.martymac.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DjZCs5P78z3vpZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:49:14 -0000 On Saturday, February 20, 2021 5:24:16 PM CET Steve Wills wrote: Hello Steve, Thanks for your reply. > I think this is because both the 'svn rm' and 'svn cp' are in one commit > and if you did them separately it would not complain, but I could be wrong. I think you're right but I would like the operation to be atomic : if I commit the removal before re-adding the port, it would leave a revision with orphan ports referencing non-existing devel/onetbb. Isn't there a mean to do that within a single commit ? -- Ganael LAPLANCHE http://www.martymac.org | http://contribs.martymac.org FreeBSD: martymac , http://www.FreeBSD.org